翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Robertson Point Light
・ Robertson Quarry Galamander
・ Robertson Quay
・ Robertson railway station
・ Robertson Ridge
・ Robertson River (New Zealand)
・ Robertson Road
・ Robertson Rural Fire Brigade
・ Robertson Scholars Program
・ Robertson Skylark SRX-1
・ Robertson Stadium
・ Robertson Stephens
・ Robertson Stewart
・ Robertson Tunnel
・ Robertson v British Gas Corp
Robertson v Thomson Corp
・ Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n
・ Robertson v. United States
・ Robertson's
・ Robertson's Colony
・ Robertson's Hams
・ Robertson, Martin & Smith
・ Robertson, New South Wales
・ Robertson, Queensland
・ Robertson, Western Cape
・ Robertson, Wyoming
・ Robertson-Easterling-McLaurin House
・ Robertson-Wesley United Church
・ Robertsoner Ruby
・ Robertsonian translocation


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Robertson v Thomson Corp : ウィキペディア英語版
Robertson v Thomson Corp
''Robertson v Thomson Corp'', is a 2006 Supreme Court of Canada decision on the ownership of copyright in published text that are stored in databases. The ruling held that though a newspaper held the copyright in the collection and the arrangement of freelance articles and in its newspaper, it could not publish the articles within a database. Publication within the database would remove the articles from the context of the collective work and were therefore their publication as such was not within the rights held by the newspaper.
==Background==
In 1995, Heather Robertson, a freelance writer, wrote two articles that were published in the print edition of the Globe and Mail. Later, the newspaper placed copies of her articles in three databases, including Info Globe Online, an online database of Globe and Mail articles, as well as the Canadian Periodical Index. The databases did not contain many aspects of the print version of the Globe and Mail. They did not contain the advertisements, some tables, photographs, artwork, photo captions, birth and death notices, financial tables, weather forecasts and some design elements.
Heather Robertson objected to the presence of her articles in the databases and sued the Globe and Mail for unauthorized reproduction of her work. The case was granted class action status. Robertson also asserted claims on behalf of salaried writers at the Globe.
The issue before the Court was whether the reproduction of Robertson's articles were part of the Globe's copyright in its newspaper or if the reproduction infringes Robertson's copyright in her work.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Robertson v Thomson Corp」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.